tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386296044044333139.post3077272370140460632..comments2023-05-02T06:12:35.185-07:00Comments on musu, musu et al: YT fail lolChommyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07222629964610461581noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386296044044333139.post-76573084104315363502009-03-23T03:53:00.000-07:002009-03-23T03:53:00.000-07:00blehanything i say now will not match CK's hardcor...bleh<BR/>anything i say now will not match CK's hardcore comment T______TAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386296044044333139.post-86364483989276702732009-03-22T03:39:00.000-07:002009-03-22T03:39:00.000-07:00I think I've seen the singer from Royal Pirates' 4...I think I've seen the singer from Royal Pirates' 411 on soompi.<BR/>that's irrelevant because I've never clicked on the link.<BR/>but they are pr0.Leanne Lai Yinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15259911333031602601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7386296044044333139.post-11224759053435128272009-03-21T15:15:00.000-07:002009-03-21T15:15:00.000-07:00Ahh.. Genetic Fallacy: fallacy where opponent prod...Ahh.. Genetic Fallacy: fallacy where opponent produces reasons that would mean he or she support the view, instead of arguing their case forward on its merit. The attack is indirect because they are saying the view is held because of their special circumstances.<BR/><BR/>I am pleased to see the utilization and recognition of fallacies in your post. However, as a friend, a feel I should help you spot some more. n_n<BR/><BR/>The title "YT fail lol" is the Slothful Induction fallacy (or scapegoat). This is a fallacy that occurs when someone blames something that is not to blame - usually because they are at fail themselves. Here you are blaming YouTube, where it might necessarily be your internet connections fault. Another example of this fallacy: "I didn't mean to kick Musu's groin, it just happened to get in the way of my foot". n_n<BR/><BR/>I think there's a Hasty Generalization here as well. Where you say YES YES YES when you have only used a small sample size to represent your argument.<BR/><BR/>Still friends, k? :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com